From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MCfny-0000cA-BA
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:14:22 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MCfnt-0000aJ-Ea
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:14:22 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50527 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MCfnt-0000Zx-Bc
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:14:17 -0400
Received: from caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca ([129.97.134.17]:53843)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>) id 1MCfnt-0007A9-3R
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:14:17 -0400
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 16:14:15 -0400
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] POLL: Why do you use kqemu?
Message-ID: <20090605201415.GA22847@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
References: <4A26F1E3.1040509@codemonkey.ws> <4A27FC69.9070501@mayc.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4A27FC69.9070501@mayc.ru>
From: lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen)
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anton D Kachalov <mouse@mayc.ru>
Cc: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 08:55:05PM +0400, Anton D Kachalov wrote:
> Good day, Anthony.
>
> There is one point missed: "I do not use kqemu".
> Just to have statistics weight for the other side.

Yeah I don't either.  I actually thought kvm had replaced it effectively.

-- 
Len Sorensen