qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Uri Lublin <uril@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] exec-migration: handle EINTR in popen_get_buffer()
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 15:20:57 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090609122057.GF3476@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090608175452.GA4995@redhat.com>

On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 08:54:52PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 07:27:21PM +0300, Uri Lublin wrote:
> > Sometimes, upon interrupt, fread returns with no data, and
> > the (incoming exec) migration fails.
> > 
> > Fix by retrying on such a case.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Uri Lublin <uril@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  savevm.c |    9 ++++++++-
> >  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/savevm.c b/savevm.c
> > index 248aea3..df2486d 100644
> > --- a/savevm.c
> > +++ b/savevm.c
> > @@ -215,7 +215,14 @@ static int popen_put_buffer(void *opaque, const uint8_t *buf, int64_t pos, int s
> >  static int popen_get_buffer(void *opaque, uint8_t *buf, int64_t pos, int size)
> >  {
> >      QEMUFilePopen *s = opaque;
> > -    return fread(buf, 1, size, s->popen_file);
> > +    FILE *fp = s->popen_file;
> > +    int bytes;
> > +
> > +    do {
> > +        clearerr(fp);
> 
> Would it make sense to only clearerr on EINTR - if we intend to retry?
> 
> > +        bytes = fread(buf, 1, size, fp);
> > +    } while ((bytes == 0) && ferror(fp) && (errno == EINTR));
> 
> 
> This does nothing about partial reads (bytes != 0)
> I think it's intentional because the user actually retries
> partial reads. Right?
> 
> > +    return bytes;
> >  }
> > 
> >  static int popen_close(void *opaque)
> 
> Looking at qemu_fill_buffer, it seems that it is enough to set
> bytes to -EAGAIN. User will then retry. Correct?

Looking at the code some more, at least qemu_get_byte really seems to
expect a reliable read underneath, so it won't work.  Generally the fact
that qemu_get_byte returns 0 on error seems broken to me maybe we could
fix that and then have a single loop retrying reads. But that's for
another patch.

Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>


-- 
MST

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-09 12:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-08 16:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] exec-migration: handle EINTR in popen_get_buffer() Uri Lublin
2009-06-08 16:55 ` Blue Swirl
2009-06-09 10:49   ` Uri Lublin
2009-06-09 14:51     ` Blue Swirl
2009-06-08 17:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-06-09 12:20   ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2009-06-09 12:32   ` Uri Lublin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-06-02 16:49 Uri Lublin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090609122057.GF3476@redhat.com \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=uril@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).