From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ME11N-00080J-6S for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 09:05:45 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ME11I-0007yo-Ao for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 09:05:44 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47775 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ME11H-0007yd-PI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 09:05:39 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:54489) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ME11H-0000Wz-5Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 09:05:39 -0400 Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 16:03:36 +0300 From: Gleb Natapov Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2] remove unused field from pci device. Message-ID: <20090609130336.GB15949@redhat.com> References: <20090609091831.GT27210@redhat.com> <200906091401.54908.paul@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200906091401.54908.paul@codesourcery.com> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paul Brook Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 02:01:52PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote: > On Tuesday 09 June 2009, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > Rename pci_irq_index to pci_device_count because this is what it > > actually does. > > This whole thing looks bogus. AFAICS the limit is completely arbitrary and > unnecessary. > So? Left it bogus with unused field and cryptic name instead? -- Gleb.