From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ME0xq-0006aX-DI
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 09:02:06 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ME0xl-0006Y2-8Q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 09:02:05 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47635 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ME0xk-0006Xo-60
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 09:02:00 -0400
Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:20521)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>)
	id 1ME0xj-0007lO-Ke
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 09:01:59 -0400
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4])
	by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>) id 1ME0xh-0000bD-Rh
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 09:01:58 -0400
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv2] remove unused field from pci device.
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 14:01:52 +0100
References: <20090609091831.GT27210@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090609091831.GT27210@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200906091401.54908.paul@codesourcery.com>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>

On Tuesday 09 June 2009, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> Rename pci_irq_index to pci_device_count because this is what it
> actually does.

This whole thing looks bogus. AFAICS the limit is completely arbitrary and 
unnecessary.

Paul