qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
	aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] create kvm-shared-all.c and kvm-shared.h
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 13:39:06 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090609163906.GO11966@poweredge.glommer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A2E8D52.4080600@redhat.com>

On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 07:26:58PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Glauber Costa wrote:
>>   
>>> Following a suggestion given by Jan, the idea here is to
>>> move shared pieces between qemu and qemu-kvm.git into a common
>>> file, so we can do sharing while avoid clashes.
>>>
>>> In the future, this files should disappear.
>>>
>>>     
>>
>> OK for the header - but why do we have to push the ioctl services into a
>> separate module? Will all functions qemu-kvm start to use from upstream
>> have to be pushed around? Or what is special about the ioctls?
>>
>> I rather think qemu-kvm should build kvm-all.c and #ifdef out those
>> parts which collide with its own implementation. Moreover, when we morph
>> qemu-kvm services for upstream, this could already happen where they
>> shall once be located: in kvm-all.c or target-*/kvm.c.
>>   
>
> Yes, we could simply append libkvm-all.c and qemu-kvm.c to kvm-all.c,  
> and gradually include more of kvm-all.c as we delete parts of libkvm.c  
> and qemu-kvm.c.
I tried it myself, and it generates tons of conflicts. So scary.
I'd prefer to do it in the way I propose, until there is nothing left on kvm-all.c

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-09 16:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-09 16:04 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] create kvm-shared-all.c and kvm-shared.h Glauber Costa
2009-06-09 16:17 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2009-06-09 16:26   ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-09 16:39     ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2009-06-09 16:42       ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-09 16:42       ` Jan Kiszka
2009-06-09 16:51         ` Glauber Costa
2009-06-09 16:51           ` Jan Kiszka
2009-06-09 16:37   ` Glauber Costa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090609163906.GO11966@poweredge.glommer \
    --to=glommer@redhat.com \
    --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).