From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ME6va-00029K-UY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 15:24:10 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ME6vW-00026L-IQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 15:24:10 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53344 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ME6vW-00026B-7J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 15:24:06 -0400 Received: from mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.49]:30579) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ME6vV-0000Mf-QT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 15:24:06 -0400 Received: from aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20090609192405.YNJ5579.mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 20:24:05 +0100 Received: from miranda.arrow ([213.107.24.213]) by aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vG.2.02.00.01 201-2161-120-102-20060912) with ESMTP id <20090609192404.YBPH2093.aamtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@miranda.arrow> for ; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 20:24:04 +0100 Received: from sdb by miranda.arrow with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1ME6vS-0008Q1-De for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:24:02 +0100 Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 20:24:01 +0100 From: Stuart Brady Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Duplicate nand device entries Message-ID: <20090609192401.GA32051@miranda.arrow> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 09:36:45PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote: > The file refers to Linux: > /* Information based on Linux drivers/mtd/nand/nand_ids.c */ > > But the same problem exists on Linux: > {"NAND 8MiB 1,8V 8-bit", 0x39, 512, 8, 0x2000, 0}, > {"NAND 128MiB 1,8V 8-bit", 0x39, 512, 128, 0x4000, 0}, > > What should be the correct entry? My googling points at the K9F6408Q0C, which is a 1.8V 8M x 8-bit chip with blocks of 8K. Cheers, -- Stuart Brady