From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MEAtA-00035V-4W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 19:37:56 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MEAt5-00033m-FS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 19:37:55 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56749 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MEAt5-00033j-8J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 19:37:51 -0400 Received: from virgo.iok.hu ([212.40.97.103]:46144) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MEAt4-0005f5-L1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 19:37:51 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 01:37:45 +0200 From: Miklos Vajna Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] target-ppc/linux-user: NPTL support Message-ID: <20090609233745.GA19075@genesis.frugalware.org> References: <1244141522-21802-1-git-send-email-froydnj@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1244141522-21802-1-git-send-email-froydnj@codesourcery.com> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Nathan Froyd Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 11:51:55AM -0700, Nathan Froyd wrote: > The patch series has been tested against the glibc testsuite, where it > passes a good chunk (90%+) of the testsuite. The other 10% are > basically things that are not going to work in QEMU anytime soon > (e.g. sharing futexes between multiple processes, using clone(2) > directly, etc.). I should note that proper testing requires a patch to > use a correct exit status for uncaught signals; such a patch has been > posted to this list before by Riku Voipio. (I have a different local > version that I used instead.) Testing with recent glibc also requires > adding support for private futexes and a few other futex operations; > again, a patch for this has been posted by Riku and I used a slightly > different local version. Hi, I tried this series (on top of current git 3a41759) + Riku's patch. I built a static qemu-ppc binary, then tried: host# chroot . /qemu-ppc -L . /bin/bash Where the current directory was a PPC chroot. It launched bash just fine, but when I tried to launch a command from the ppc bash, I got: chroot# /bin/uname bash: /bin/uname: No such file or directory While the binary is there: host# file bin/uname bin/uname: ELF 32-bit MSB executable, PowerPC or cisco 4500, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.24, with unknown capability 0x41000000 = 0x11676e75, with unknown capability 0x10000 = 0x90401, stripped Let me know if you need more info to reproduce the issue. Thanks. --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkou8kkACgkQe81tAgORUJas0ACfSsU3Eh9r0UEPqtE5FhrvpNA8 D1gAn1mQqUqepDDsgLzRXz4VdfUaFtkB =l2e/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q--