From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MEBce-0001NY-77 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:24:56 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MEBcZ-0001GQ-DQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:24:55 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35415 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MEBcZ-0001G6-7B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:24:51 -0400 Received: from nan.false.org ([208.75.86.248]:56235) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MEBcY-0003wm-VX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:24:51 -0400 Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 20:24:47 -0400 From: Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] target-ppc/linux-user: NPTL support Message-ID: <20090610002447.GA26173@caradoc.them.org> References: <1244141522-21802-1-git-send-email-froydnj@codesourcery.com> <20090609233745.GA19075@genesis.frugalware.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090609233745.GA19075@genesis.frugalware.org> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Miklos Vajna Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Nathan Froyd On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 01:37:45AM +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote: > On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 11:51:55AM -0700, Nathan Froyd wrote: > > The patch series has been tested against the glibc testsuite, where it > > passes a good chunk (90%+) of the testsuite. The other 10% are > > basically things that are not going to work in QEMU anytime soon > > (e.g. sharing futexes between multiple processes, using clone(2) > > directly, etc.). I should note that proper testing requires a patch to > > use a correct exit status for uncaught signals; such a patch has been > > posted to this list before by Riku Voipio. (I have a different local > > version that I used instead.) Testing with recent glibc also requires > > adding support for private futexes and a few other futex operations; > > again, a patch for this has been posted by Riku and I used a slightly > > different local version. > > Hi, > > I tried this series (on top of current git 3a41759) + Riku's patch. I > built a static qemu-ppc binary, then tried: > > host# chroot . /qemu-ppc -L . /bin/bash > > Where the current directory was a PPC chroot. It launched bash just > fine, but when I tried to launch a command from the ppc bash, I got: > > chroot# /bin/uname > bash: /bin/uname: No such file or directory This isn't expected to work, is it? QEMU does not intercept exec system calls for target binaries. [Maybe it should...] -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery