From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MELOA-0006u9-SM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 06:50:38 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MELO6-0006sY-0G
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 06:50:37 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57293 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MELO3-0006s5-UF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 06:50:32 -0400
Received: from virgo.iok.hu ([212.40.97.103]:53511)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <vmiklos@frugalware.org>) id 1MELO3-0001mI-EB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 06:50:31 -0400
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:50:28 +0200
From: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] target-ppc/linux-user: NPTL support
Message-ID: <20090610105028.GJ19075@genesis.frugalware.org>
References: <25537768.336811244630656380.JavaMail.servlet@kundenserver>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Dx9iWuMxHO1cCoFc"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <25537768.336811244630656380.JavaMail.servlet@kundenserver>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, froydnj@codesourcery.com


--Dx9iWuMxHO1cCoFc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 12:44:16PM +0200, Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu=
> wrote:
> >And the a test binary using fork() works fine as well:
> [...]
>=20
> The problem is not with fork() but with exec().

Yes, but as I showed in the other mail stat() has some weird behaviour
as well. I just noticed this all when I wanted to see if qemu-ppc can
execute a native gcc, where it failed to find cc1, which was - of course
- there.

--Dx9iWuMxHO1cCoFc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkovj/QACgkQe81tAgORUJaJqQCfU4Gl9203TV52SAKiqryTIxyX
ci0An3W10swMMh8XqkBi8/dh5XXsICDv
=Y2UK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Dx9iWuMxHO1cCoFc--