From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MET6H-0007D0-PE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:04:41 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MET6D-0007Al-5s for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:04:41 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50131 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MET6C-0007Ag-Ug for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:04:37 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:36314) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MET6C-0000BF-7N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:04:36 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:08:38 -0300 From: Glauber Costa Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] Include and build libfdt Message-ID: <20090610190838.GA9461@poweredge.glommer> References: <20090610173803.4674.82538.stgit@wren.home> <20090610173812.4674.57930.stgit@wren.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090610173812.4674.57930.stgit@wren.home> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paul Brook Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 06:38:12PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote: > Inlcude libfdt in source tree, and build it if not already available. what makes libfdt different than everything else that we link with? Why do we have to have a in-tree copy of that?