From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1METSV-0003xM-Gp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:27:39 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1METSQ-0003uI-Ug for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:27:39 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55670 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1METSQ-0003tz-Kk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:27:34 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:2285) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1METSQ-0000Fd-89 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:27:34 -0400 Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1METSP-00080V-9I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:27:33 -0400 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] Include and build libfdt Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:27:30 +0100 References: <20090610173803.4674.82538.stgit@wren.home> <20090610173812.4674.57930.stgit@wren.home> <20090610190838.GA9461@poweredge.glommer> In-Reply-To: <20090610190838.GA9461@poweredge.glommer> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200906102027.30706.paul@codesourcery.com> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Glauber Costa On Wednesday 10 June 2009, Glauber Costa wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 06:38:12PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote: > > Inlcude libfdt in source tree, and build it if not already available. > > what makes libfdt different than everything else that we link with? > Why do we have to have a in-tree copy of that? AFAIK libfdt is still absent from current releases of common mainstream distros[1], and qemu is going to become increasingly useless without it. c.f. dtc where we use the system version. Paul [1] We can argue about what constitutes sufficiently wide acceptance, but IMHO Fedora, Ubuntu and Debian Sid would be a fairly good start.