From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MEUZi-0002Jr-7X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:39:10 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MEUZd-0002DK-IS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:39:09 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49222 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MEUZd-0002D8-EE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:39:05 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:5583) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MEUZc-0003gV-Ur for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:39:05 -0400 Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MEUZZ-0003BO-Pd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:39:02 -0400 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] Include and build libfdt Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:38:58 +0100 References: <20090610173803.4674.82538.stgit@wren.home> <200906102027.30706.paul@codesourcery.com> <20090610194114.GA12402@shell.devel.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20090610194114.GA12402@shell.devel.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200906102138.59209.paul@codesourcery.com> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Glauber Costa On Wednesday 10 June 2009, Glauber Costa wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 08:27:30PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote: > > On Wednesday 10 June 2009, Glauber Costa wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 06:38:12PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote: > > > > Inlcude libfdt in source tree, and build it if not already available. > > > > > > what makes libfdt different than everything else that we link with? > > > Why do we have to have a in-tree copy of that? > > > > AFAIK libfdt is still absent from current releases of common mainstream > > distros, and qemu is going to become increasingly useless without it. > > This is an argument for both including it in our source release, > and pushing it to get shipped as a stand alone package. I believe the later > is a much more sane approach long term Agreed. The configure check will prefer an installed libfdt, so hopefully the in-tree copy will go away over timer. Paul