From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MEkeQ-0001zc-Rc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:49:06 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MEkeL-0001xf-Vh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:49:06 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50407 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MEkeL-0001xZ-S2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:49:01 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:57977) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MEkeL-00073f-De for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:49:01 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:46:56 +0300 From: Gleb Natapov Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Register uhci_reset() callback. Message-ID: <20090611134656.GC19508@redhat.com> References: <20090611084808.GA19508@redhat.com> <200906111441.34151.paul@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200906111441.34151.paul@codesourcery.com> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paul Brook Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 02:41:33PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote: > On Thursday 11 June 2009, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > Update IRQ line on reset. > > This should not be necessary. > You are always so brief. Can you please spent a little bit more time and afford and explain why is should not be necessary, because it is clear that I think it is that is why I put it there in the first place. -- Gleb.