From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MEkiY-00052s-Cn
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:53:22 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MEkiT-00050V-RW
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:53:22 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39713 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MEkiT-00050Q-MQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:53:17 -0400
Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:42046)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>)
	id 1MEkiT-0007wL-B0
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:53:17 -0400
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4])
	by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <paul@codesourcery.com>) id 1MEkiR-0003MD-Vg
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:53:16 -0400
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Register uhci_reset() callback.
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:53:12 +0100
References: <20090611084808.GA19508@redhat.com>
	<200906111441.34151.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<20090611134656.GC19508@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20090611134656.GC19508@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200906111453.13421.paul@codesourcery.com>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Thursday 11 June 2009, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 02:41:33PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
> > On Thursday 11 June 2009, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > Update IRQ line on reset.
> >
> > This should not be necessary.
>
> You are always so brief. Can you please spent a little bit more time and
> afford and explain why is should not be necessary, because it is clear
> that I think it is that is why I put it there in the first place.

Ok. Let me put this annother way.
I don't think this is necessary. What bug are you fixing, and why is this the 
right solution?

Paul