From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MElyn-000536-Sa
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:14:14 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MElym-00052k-Qj
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:14:12 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35767 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MElym-00052f-M6
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:14:12 -0400
Received: from naru.obs2.net ([84.20.150.76]:44728)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <nchip@kos.to>) id 1MElym-0005g0-7Z
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:14:12 -0400
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:14:10 +0300
From: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] check for utimensat() availability on
	configure
Message-ID: <20090611151410.GB18020@kos.to>
References: <1244582792-30589-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com>
	<1244582792-30589-3-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com>
	<87ocsxoye4.fsf@lechat.rtp-net.org>
	<20090610141255.GZ18045@blackpad>
	<87bpownof6.fsf@lechat.rtp-net.org>
	<1244659259-sup-8660@blackpad> <20090610214826.GC23525@kos.to>
	<1244670940-sup-4117@blackpad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1244670940-sup-4117@blackpad>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@raisama.net>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 07:09:56PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> Cool. :)

> Now, we really need to get the fixes from the maemo tree merged on the
> master repository. How much have the trees diverged?

The trees haven't really diverged, there is little development happening
in mainline linux-user/ code. The only problem I got when rebasing yesterday
was that microblaze port was added and the coredump support adding patch
broke building microblaze. Thus coredump patch needed slight adjusting.