From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MHK2b-00070a-1O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:00:41 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MHK2W-0006zu-W2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:00:40 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47446 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MHK2W-0006zg-LV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:00:36 -0400 Received: from cheetah.cs.fiu.edu ([131.94.130.107]:55714) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MHK2W-0000UX-4m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:00:36 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:00:30 -0400 From: Luis Useche Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] POLL: Support for instrumentation? Message-ID: <20090618160030.GA7744@meg.local> References: <1245336842.32163.18.camel@dis> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1245336842.32163.18.camel@dis> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Sami Kiminki Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 05:54:02PM +0300, Sami Kiminki wrote: > We are considering doing some work on instrumentation support for QEMU. > But before rushing into implementation, I wonder if there is more > general interest in this subject, and if so, what kind of > instrumentation would you like to see? I have been trying to instrument qemu code to get the traces of memory accesses. I have seen several threads in this mail list talking about this topic so probably it will be well received. Bochs provides an instrumentation utility that you can probably look to get some ideas. Best, -- Luis Useche Ph.D. Student Florida International University