From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MJVZt-0000yH-Jy
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:44:05 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MJVZp-0000vk-Rr
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:44:05 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43583 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MJVZp-0000vc-Lp
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:44:01 -0400
Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:18827)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <jamie@shareable.org>) id 1MJVZp-00037J-Ap
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:44:01 -0400
Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115])
	by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <jamie@shareable.org>) id 1MJVZo-00053M-JT
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:44:00 -0400
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:43:45 +0100
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/2] introduce -cpu host target
Message-ID: <20090624164345.GF14121@shareable.org>
References: <1245707277-769-1-git-send-email-andre.przywara@amd.com>
	<4A41F7EC.2000305@redhat.com> <4A420836.10302@amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4A420836.10302@amd.com>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@amd.com>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Andre Przywara wrote:
> Even worse, most of them cannot be properly emulated (like disable
> Lock prefix).

Disable Lock prefix should be easy to emulate by ignoring it,
shouldn't it? :-)

-- Jamie