From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MJdAn-0004hu-NG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:50:41 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MJdAi-0004h2-M0
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:50:40 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40119 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MJdAi-0004gz-JK
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:50:36 -0400
Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]:52991)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <jamie@shareable.org>) id 1MJdAi-000238-4z
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:50:36 -0400
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 01:50:32 +0100
From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Regression opening read-only cdroms
Message-ID: <20090625005032.GJ14121@shareable.org>
References: <4A37896C.8050208@redhat.com>
	<20090616143259.GA29040@shareable.org>
	<20090618123759.GA7041@amd.home.annexia.org>
	<20090624202353.GV14121@shareable.org>
	<20090624224353.GA24810@amd.home.annexia.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090624224353.GA24810@amd.home.annexia.org>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 09:23:53PM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> > It'd be nice to enforce it, instead of depending on good behaviour
> > from the guest.
> 
> Right - but in libguestfs everything is controlled by the host so we
> can rely on good behaviour in our case.

In that case, why do you need the ",snapshot=on"?

-- Jamie