From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MLI2P-0005FN-42 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:40:53 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MLI2J-0005D4-A5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:40:52 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57495 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MLI2J-0005Cx-1O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:40:47 -0400 Received: from caffeine.csclub.uwaterloo.ca ([129.97.134.17]:50423) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MLI2I-0004Y2-Kj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:40:46 -0400 Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:40:45 -0400 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Building Qemu 0.10.5 fails with an error about missing tcg-target.h Message-ID: <20090629144044.GD15751@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> References: <8e04b5820906270952o34cf6c5bu2410e2680fe37344@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8e04b5820906270952o34cf6c5bu2410e2680fe37344@mail.gmail.com> From: lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen) List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Ciprian Dorin, Craciun" Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 07:52:35PM +0300, Ciprian Dorin, Craciun wrote: > Hello all! > > I've tried to build Qemu 0.10.5 and it fails with: > ... > error: tcg-target.h: No such file or directory > warning: "TCG_TARGET_REG_BITS" is not defined > ... > > I've attached a file that contains both build commands and output. > I'm on Debian Lenny i386 with a 2.6.30 kernel, and GCC 4.2. I've tried > also Qemu 0.10.0 and the same thing happens. (I've also pasted below > only the build script.) Well I took the 0.10.5 source package from unstable and built it in Lenny, and I don't remember having to do anything to the package to make it build. Perhaps you are missing some build dependancy (which the source package would tell you about), or perhaps debian has patched something to make it work. Might be worth looking at the debian package from unstable. -- Len Sorensen