From: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>
To: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, arnaud.patard@rtp-net.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] linux-user: do not avoid dumping of qemu itself
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:01:45 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090630170145.GA7830@kos.to> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200906301552.12732.paul@codesourcery.com>
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 03:52:12PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 June 2009, riku.voipio@iki.fi wrote:
> > From: Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>
> >
> > Previously we disabled dumping of qemu itself if we already
> > created coredump of the target process. This broke the abort01
> > LTP test and any application that used WCOREDUMP to find out
> > the child process dumped core. Remove this feature.
> Isn't this going to overwrite the guest core dump we just wrote?
No, since we make the guest dump as qemu_binary_date-time_pid.core,
while host core will be core or whatever is /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern.
However, if we replace our adhoc naming with reading core_pattern, we
would indeed get overwritten.
> It sounds like WCOREDUMP is one of those things that just isn't going to work.
> i.e. we have to just accept the limitation and xfail the test.
If this how people feel, I'll be glad to drop this patch.
Riku
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-30 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-30 14:15 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] Fixes for linux-user riku.voipio
2009-06-30 14:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] linux-user: increment MAX_ARG_PAGES riku.voipio
2009-06-30 14:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] linux-user: check some parameters for some socket syscalls riku.voipio
2009-06-30 14:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] linux-user: do not avoid dumping of qemu itself riku.voipio
2009-06-30 14:52 ` Paul Brook
2009-06-30 17:01 ` Riku Voipio [this message]
2009-07-01 20:34 ` Arnaud Patard
2009-07-01 23:31 ` Paul Brook
2009-07-02 2:19 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-07-02 13:19 ` Paul Brook
2009-07-02 20:01 ` Riku Voipio
2009-07-03 2:25 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-07-03 2:20 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-06-30 14:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] linux-user/syscall.c: remove warning: ‘array’ may be used uninitialized in this function riku.voipio
2009-06-30 14:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] configure: remove bogus linux-user check riku.voipio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090630170145.GA7830@kos.to \
--to=riku.voipio@iki.fi \
--cc=arnaud.patard@rtp-net.org \
--cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).