From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Allow setting qemu process name
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 13:34:06 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090701133406.3f7bef81@doriath> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A4B8E86.8060501@redhat.com>
On Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:27:50 +0300
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 07/01/2009 07:19 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >>> Andi Kleen wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> [this is a port of a old KVM userland patch I had; Avi back then
> >>>> suggested to submit it to qemu]
> >>>>
> >>>> Set the Linux process name to the name argument specified with
> >>>> "-name". I find
> >>>> this useful to see which guests are taking CPU time in top.
> >>>>
> >>> This is not a bad idea but it has to be optional and non-default.
> >>> Maybe a new command line option?
> >>>
> >> -name [title=]blah[,process=foobar]
> >>
> >
> > Just a question: do we have a plan on stopping/avoiding adding new
> > command-line options?
> >
>
> Not at all. But it makes sense to group related features into a single
> command line option IMO.
Sure, it's seems better to me as well. I'm just curious on what we
are going to do for new features that requires configurable options.
The command-line we have is already quite big...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-01 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-01 9:32 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Allow setting qemu process name Andi Kleen
2009-07-01 13:29 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-01 13:43 ` Andi Kleen
2009-07-01 13:57 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-01 14:06 ` Andi Kleen
2009-07-01 15:08 ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-01 16:27 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-07-01 15:07 ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-01 16:19 ` Luiz Capitulino
2009-07-01 16:27 ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-01 16:34 ` Luiz Capitulino [this message]
2009-07-01 16:43 ` Avi Kivity
2009-07-01 17:02 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-07-01 17:43 ` Stefan Weil
2009-07-23 11:47 ` Todd T. Fries
2009-07-23 12:01 ` Andi Kleen
2009-07-23 12:58 ` Todd T. Fries
2009-07-23 14:30 ` Andi Kleen
2009-07-24 9:34 ` Richard W.M. Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090701133406.3f7bef81@doriath \
--to=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).