From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MO7vs-0003qd-MP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 06:29:52 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MO7vn-0003q5-QG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 06:29:51 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57305 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MO7vn-0003py-Ii for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 06:29:47 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:46179) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MO7vm-0006iB-Qb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 06:29:47 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 12:28:47 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-iotests: Test L1 table growth Message-ID: <20090707102847.GA23964@lst.de> References: <1246888767-29072-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> <20090706185448.GA6800@lst.de> <4A52FBE1.70302@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A52FBE1.70302@redhat.com> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: Christoph Hellwig , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 09:40:17AM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Ok, so using qemu in our tests is basically impossible because we can't > get any status messages. Bad news. > > For this one we can handle it differently: I'll implement > bdrv_get/put_buffer in qemu-io, this should be more or less the same to > the image format drivers. We even get more control over the data > written, so I guess this is the better approach anyway. Yes, that's a very good plan.