From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MO7wt-00048D-Gm
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 06:30:55 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MO7wo-00046m-Cp
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 06:30:54 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57330 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MO7wo-00046g-6G
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 06:30:50 -0400
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:46240)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <hch@lst.de>) id 1MO7wn-00072u-K2
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 06:30:50 -0400
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 12:30:46 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] RFC: Add new block driver for the VDI format
Message-ID: <20090707103046.GB23964@lst.de>
References: <4A4E5AFC.4020206@mail.berlios.de> <4A51FE07.2040307@codemonkey.ws>
	<4A52682D.7000602@mail.berlios.de> <4A52FF8D.1020200@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4A52FF8D.1020200@redhat.com>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 09:55:57AM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> For the write bug you might want to write a new qemu-iotests test case
> as it doesn't seem to be covered yet (at least, Christoph said the
> driver passes).

Yes, the test suite passes.  But currrently the coverage for non-qcow2
image formats is a bit limited as we skip all tests that require an
image check.  I plan to change that soon and run all tests for all image
formats - a lacking qemu-img check command will simply cause the check
to always succeed.