From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MOD9w-00080U-6Q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:04:44 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MOD9r-0007sc-A4
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:04:43 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59692 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MOD9r-0007sG-6L
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:04:39 -0400
Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:13027)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <froydnj@codesourcery.com>)
	id 1MOD9p-0003cJ-S8
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:04:38 -0400
Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4])
	by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <froydnj@codesourcery.com>) id 1MOD9l-0004zB-MR
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:04:34 -0400
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:04:32 -0700
From: Nathan Froyd <froydnj@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] gdb-xml: fix hacks in powerpc register
	numbering
Message-ID: <20090707160432.GR11286@codesourcery.com>
References: <1244167348-806-1-git-send-email-froydnj@codesourcery.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1244167348-806-1-git-send-email-froydnj@codesourcery.com>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 07:02:28PM -0700, Nathan Froyd wrote:
> The powerpc xml files contained a hack--an empty, non-existent
> register--for getting the register numbers to line up for
> newer (XML-aware) and older (non-XML-aware) GDB.  While this hack worked
> in some cases, it didn't work in all cases, notably when the user used
> `finish' or `continue': GDB would attempt to read the non-existent
> register and QEMU would complain.
> 
> This patch fixes things up properly.  Instead of inserting a fake
> register, we explicitly declare the floating-point and SPE registers to
> start at 71.  This action accomplishes the same thing as the nasty hack,
> except that now GDB never tries to fetch the non-existant register 70.

Ping again.  It would be nice to get this in prior to the stable 0.11.0               
release.

-Nathan