From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MPBMI-0006uz-60
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:21:30 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MPBMD-0006qO-AB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:21:29 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48283 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MPBMC-0006qB-SR
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:21:25 -0400
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.82]:58206)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <samuel.thibault@labri.fr>)
	id 1MPBMC-0002VO-GD
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:21:24 -0400
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:21:21 +0200
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/6] use uint32_t for ioport port and value
	instead of int.
Message-ID: <20090710082121.GB5471@const.bordeaux.inria.fr>
References: <1246530731-14597-1-git-send-email-yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
	<1246530731-14597-7-git-send-email-yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
	<4A564003.5080707@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <4A564003.5080707@codemonkey.ws>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Anthony Liguori, le Thu 09 Jul 2009 14:07:47 -0500, a écrit :
> Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> >use uint32_t for ioport port and value instead of int.
> >  
> 
> Why?

In theory int could be only signed 16bit, so at least unsigned int could
be needed for the port. uint16_t should be fine. For value, as said
uint8/16/32 should probably be better.

Samuel