From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MPBsR-0006Zn-FA
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:54:43 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MPBsM-0006Tr-Fy
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:54:42 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39711 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MPBsM-0006TZ-6F
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:54:38 -0400
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.104]:24132)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <samuel.thibault@labri.fr>)
	id 1MPBsL-0000dO-Da
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:54:37 -0400
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:54:34 +0200
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/6] use uint32_t for ioport port and value
	instead of int.
Message-ID: <20090710085434.GK5471@const.bordeaux.inria.fr>
References: <1246530731-14597-1-git-send-email-yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
	<1246530731-14597-7-git-send-email-yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
	<4A564003.5080707@codemonkey.ws>
	<20090710082121.GB5471@const.bordeaux.inria.fr>
	<20090710084508.GM12665%yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20090710084508.GM12665%yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Isaku Yamahata <yamahata@valinux.co.jp>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Isaku Yamahata, le Fri 10 Jul 2009 17:45:08 +0900, a écrit :
> void cpu_out[bwl](CPUState *env, int64_t addr, int{8, 16, 32}_t val);

uint16_t addr, and uint* for val

> uint{8, 16, 32}_t cpu_inw(CPUState *env, int16_t addr);

uint16_t addr

Samuel