From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MPH4y-0007tF-OZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:28:00 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MPH4u-0007ol-PO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:28:00 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39389 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MPH4u-0007oO-JH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:27:56 -0400
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:34281)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <hch@lst.de>) id 1MPH4u-0001Ba-1H
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:27:56 -0400
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:27:50 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-iotests: make a few more tests generic
Message-ID: <20090710142749.GA20030@lst.de>
References: <20090708194143.GA14640@lst.de> <4A55BF62.9070702@redhat.com>
	<20090709132513.GA13722@lst.de> <4A56F22A.8030406@redhat.com>
	<4A573908.5020600@us.ibm.com> <20090710133431.GA17096@lst.de>
	<4A574499.3010907@us.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4A574499.3010907@us.ibm.com>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 08:39:37AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> What about akpm-style automated notifications that a patch has been 
> queued and/or rejected from queue?  These would just go to the sender, 
> not the list.

That would work for me.