From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] monitor: Add port write command
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:12:22 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090715111222.GG28046@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200907151114.21482.paul@codesourcery.com>
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:14:20AM +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
> > > I'd be reluctant to expose the savevm state to the user.
> > >
> > > For debugging qemu I don't see it providing any real benefit over firing
> > > up GDB and poking directly at the device directly.
> >
> > Not all environments where you need to debug things have gdb, qemu
> > sources or even non striped qemu binary.
>
> If you don't have qemu sources than I really don't care. By definition you're
I noticed that you don't care, but I do.
> not going to be able to do anything useful even if you do figure out what the
> problem is. Note that there's no requirement that you run gdb on the target
I will be able to fix the bug if I'll figuring out what the problem is,
so I don't see how this is not useful.
> itself. Remote debug (e.g. via gdbserver on linux) is a well established
> technique.
>
Client will not allow me near his infrastructure, he is nice enough to
dump device state for me if it's simple.
> Likewise for debugging stripped production binaries, my answer is "don't do
> that". There are very rare cases where a bug goes away on a debug build, but
> in those cases any instrumentation you add is also liable to make the bug go
> away.
>
Have you sees a real production environment and tried to resolve real
customer bugs? Just asking.
--
Gleb.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-15 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-14 8:20 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] monitor: Add port write command Jan Kiszka
2009-07-14 15:06 ` Anthony Liguori
[not found] ` <m31voj47ht.fsf@neno.mitica>
2009-07-14 15:49 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2009-07-14 18:57 ` [Qemu-devel] " Blue Swirl
2009-07-14 19:30 ` Paul Brook
2009-07-14 20:03 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-14 20:37 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jan Kiszka
2009-07-15 7:34 ` [Qemu-devel] " Gleb Natapov
2009-07-15 10:14 ` Paul Brook
2009-07-15 10:40 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-07-15 11:14 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-07-15 11:12 ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2009-07-15 12:36 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-15 14:38 ` Paul Brook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090715111222.GG28046@redhat.com \
--to=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).