From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MULdy-0005or-4V for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:21:06 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MULdt-0005m1-BA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:21:05 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33262 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MULdt-0005lv-5C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:21:01 -0400 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:54690) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MULds-0005PA-OQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:21:01 -0400 Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 11:20:53 -0300 From: Luiz Capitulino Message-ID: <20090724112053.62b67d03@doriath> In-Reply-To: References: <20090723185844.474f7c62@doriath> <20090724105402.1ea81ad5@doriath> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: kvm: savevm is broken for me List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:18:02 +0200 Alexander Graf wrote: > > On 24.07.2009, at 15:54, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > > > On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:06:13 +0200 > > Alexander Graf wrote: > > > >> On 23.07.2009, at 23:58, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> Hi there, > >>> > >>> If I try to 'savevm' with latest Anthony's tree (HEAD > >>> 6f725c139ae975646c44ace77bf796318a5783da) QEMU will hang and I know > >>> it's not saving anything because vmstat shows no disk activity > >>> (which > >>> is the opposite behavior of when 'savevm' works). > >>> > >>> According to 'git bisect' the week's winner is: > >>> > >>> """ > >>> commit bd8367761236cd5c435598aeb2f1b8240c09b059 > >>> Author: Alexander Graf > >>> Date: Fri Jul 17 13:51:48 2009 +0200 > >>> > >>> Fake dirty loggin when it's not there > >>> """ > >>> > >>> Indeed, reverting this makes 'savevm' work for me. > >> > >> > >> Yikes. I have no idea why, but just revert the patch :-). I don't > >> really need it anymore since we now have dirty logging in PPC. > >> > >> Maybe it's the if (is dirty logging really enabled?) in the > >> beginning? > > > > Yes, it's the if. I have removed it and savevm works. > > > > Can you submit the fix please? > > Eh - what fix? You found that something doesn't set or evaluate the > flags right. That still doesn't tell us who behaves incorrectly. Ah, okay. I thought you meant the 'if' _was_ the bug. Better to revert then?