qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Filip Navara <filip.navara@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] Remove setvbuf(<handle>, NULL, _IOLBF, 0) calls for Win32
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:42:08 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090727134208.GA3803@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5b31733c0907270633xb49d83we1858a6e9ba45d63@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 03:33:08PM +0200, Filip Navara wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Daniel Jacobowitz<drow@false.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 10:02:04AM +0000, Filip Navara wrote:
> >> On Win32 the setvbuf function requires the last parameter to be size between 2 and INT_MAX bytes, so the calls always failed. Since the whole point of the calls is to set line-buffered mode for the file handle and that's not supported on Win32 anyway, conditionally remove them.
> >
> > Should they be unbuffered where _IOLBF is not supported, then?  I
> > assume the line buffering was to make them more useful in event of a
> > crash.
> 
> I guess your assumption is correct. I'd be fine with using _IONBF for
> the exec.c part, but setting it for stdout doesn't sound too useful to
> me.

I've found that leaving stdout buffered on Windows is a pain; on Unix
"isatty()" is reliable, but on Windows it breaks down at the
Cygwin/Windows interaction border.  So your simulated programs end up
using block output all the time if you have a mingw32 qemu in a Cygwin
terminal, for instance.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-27 13:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-27  8:02 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] Remove setvbuf(<handle>, NULL, _IOLBF, 0) calls for Win32 Filip Navara
2009-07-27 13:21 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-07-27 13:33   ` Filip Navara
2009-07-27 13:42     ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2009-07-27 14:25       ` Filip Navara
2009-07-27 14:32         ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090727134208.GA3803@caradoc.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=filip.navara@gmail.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).