From: Glauber Costa <glommer@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] fix broken migration
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:02:18 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090727180218.GF4776@poweredge.glommer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A6A61D4.1080807@redhat.com>
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 03:37:24AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 07/24/2009 10:20 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
>> While fixing migration with -S, commit
>> 89befdd1a6b18215153b8976682d57b7d03d5782 broke the rest of us.
>
> With this patch a migrated virtual machine will never be restarted. If
> you want that, shouldn't you use -S? But if you really wanted a
> migrated virtual machine to never be restarted, didn't you have a
> problem before my patch as well?
>
> Note that autostart (the variable) is never read except to choose
> whether to do that vm_start; so there can be no collateral effects from
> passing -S.
>
> I don't understand what this patch is trying to achieve (and why).
If I pass --incoming to the VM, I don't expect the VM to start. I expect it
to wait, because I'll be handling it a migration later. However, it does start,
which is clearly wrong.
Of course, it does not start if we pass -S in conjunction with --incoming, but this
is a totally crazy semantics. An option should not depend on another option
to do the right thing.
As I said in the changelog, -S is still respected in migration because we're not
automatically vm_start()'in anything after migration completes, and also work
with a migrated machine that is already running. So what am I missing here?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-27 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-24 20:20 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] fix broken migration Glauber Costa
2009-07-25 1:37 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2009-07-27 18:02 ` Glauber Costa [this message]
2009-07-27 19:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2009-07-27 20:18 ` Glauber Costa
2009-07-27 21:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] fix migration to not require -S Paolo Bonzini
2009-07-27 21:17 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH alternative] fix migration to obey -S Paolo Bonzini
2009-07-27 21:29 ` [Qemu-devel] " Glauber Costa
2009-07-27 21:36 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-07-27 23:15 ` Glauber Costa
2009-07-27 23:13 ` Anthony Liguori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090727180218.GF4776@poweredge.glommer \
--to=glommer@redhat.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).