From: Bill Paul <wpaul@windriver.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] e1000.c doesn't properly emulate EERD and ICS registers
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:22:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200907291023.02372.wpaul@windriver.com> (raw)
Once again, the emulation of the EERD and ICS registers in e1000.c is
incorrect. Nobody has noticed this before because none of the Intel-written
e1000 drivers use these registers, and all of the independently written open
source drivers copy Intel's example, so they don't use them either.
Regardless, these registers are documented in the programmer's manuals, and
their emulated behavior doesn't match the verified behavior of real hardware,
so any software that does use them doesn't function correctly.
-Bill
Signed-off-by: Bill Paul <wpaul@windriver.com>
---
diff --git a/hw/e1000.c b/hw/e1000.c
index 9bc4442..b0542d7 100644
--- a/hw/e1000.c
+++ b/hw/e1000.c
@@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ set_interrupt_cause(E1000State *s, int index, uint32_t
val)
if (val)
val |= E1000_ICR_INT_ASSERTED;
s->mac_reg[ICR] = val;
+ s->mac_reg[ICS] = val;
qemu_set_irq(s->dev.irq[0], (s->mac_reg[IMS] & s->mac_reg[ICR]) != 0);
}
@@ -286,10 +287,14 @@ flash_eerd_read(E1000State *s, int x)
{
unsigned int index, r = s->mac_reg[EERD] & ~E1000_EEPROM_RW_REG_START;
+ if ((s->mac_reg[EERD] & E1000_EEPROM_RW_REG_START) == 0)
+ return (s->mac_reg[EERD]);
+
if ((index = r >> E1000_EEPROM_RW_ADDR_SHIFT) > EEPROM_CHECKSUM_REG)
- return 0;
- return (s->eeprom_data[index] << E1000_EEPROM_RW_REG_DATA) |
- E1000_EEPROM_RW_REG_DONE | r;
+ return (E1000_EEPROM_RW_REG_DONE | r);
+
+ return ((s->eeprom_data[index] << E1000_EEPROM_RW_REG_DATA) |
+ E1000_EEPROM_RW_REG_DONE | r);
}
static void
@@ -780,7 +785,7 @@ static uint32_t (*macreg_readops[])(E1000State *, int) = {
getreg(WUFC), getreg(TDT), getreg(CTRL), getreg(LEDCTL),
getreg(MANC), getreg(MDIC), getreg(SWSM), getreg(STATUS),
getreg(TORL), getreg(TOTL), getreg(IMS), getreg(TCTL),
- getreg(RDH), getreg(RDT), getreg(VET),
+ getreg(RDH), getreg(RDT), getreg(VET), getreg(ICS),
[TOTH] = mac_read_clr8, [TORH] = mac_read_clr8, [GPRC] = mac_read_clr4,
[GPTC] = mac_read_clr4, [TPR] = mac_read_clr4, [TPT] = mac_read_clr4,
reply other threads:[~2009-07-29 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200907291023.02372.wpaul@windriver.com \
--to=wpaul@windriver.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).