From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
To: Ed Swierk <eswierk@aristanetworks.com>
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] slirp: Read host DNS config on demand
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 14:30:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090803133008.GB23062@shareable.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9ae48b020908021908v123aa866g470b78477f369594@mail.gmail.com>
Ed Swierk wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Jan Kiszka<jan.kiszka@web.de> wrote:
> > IMHO, 10 s is below the user surprise threshold for a dynamically
> > changing network link. Moreover, inotify does not exist on all platforms.
> >
> > Let's keep things simple for the first step, we could still further
> > improve it later on. 10 s are already an improvement over the current
> > infinite timeout.
>
> Right. The most common situation in which the DNS server address
> changes is after you wake up your laptop and wait for it to connect to
> a new network. DHCP itself can take several seconds to do its thing,
> so you're unlikely to notice the up-to-10-second delay before full
> network connectivity is restored in a VM.
I strongly disagree. Usual practice is to watch the NetworkManager
icon until it indicates that DHCP is complete with a green light,
finger poised over the clicking button, and then expect web browsing
and SSH to work immediately after the green light appears. A 10
second delay at that point would be most irritating.
Ideally, that's what RTNETLINK events are for: you can register for
asynchronous events whenever a network interface is reconfigured, and
trigger things like rereading /etc/resolv.conf from that. Windows has
a similar mechanism for watching interface changes.
But a 1/2 second delay would be fine.
> Of course there's nothing magical about 10 seconds. A shorter timeout
> would be even nicer, and I doubt anyone would really miss the CPU
> cycles lost to re-reading a tiny text file, but I don't think
> instantaneous response is required here.
All you need is to call stat() to confirm that the file hasn't
changed. Just check the dev/ino/mtime/size.
If that were a periodic 1 second timer, the biggest cost on a laptop
might be power drain due to CPU wakeups. But since the resolv.conf
check should only should be done in reaction to the VM actively doing
a DNS query (plus 1 second has passed since the last resolve.conf
check), the CPU is already woken up, so it's cheap.
-- Jamie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-03 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-01 1:10 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] slirp: Read host DNS config on demand Ed Swierk
2009-08-02 7:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-08-02 8:03 ` Jan Kiszka
2009-08-02 8:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-08-03 2:08 ` Ed Swierk
2009-08-03 13:30 ` Jamie Lokier [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-07-22 17:57 Ed Swierk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090803133008.GB23062@shareable.org \
--to=jamie@shareable.org \
--cc=eswierk@aristanetworks.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).