From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MXzx2-0002mt-9p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 11:59:52 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MXzwx-0002jB-Gd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 11:59:51 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57730 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MXzwx-0002j1-9J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 11:59:47 -0400 Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:51324) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MXzww-00088L-Qd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 11:59:47 -0400 Received: from mail.codesourcery.com ([65.74.133.4]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MXzwv-0005NK-Od for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 11:59:46 -0400 Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 08:59:44 -0700 From: Nathan Froyd Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] cleanup cpu-exec.c: consolidate handle_cpu_signal Message-ID: <20090803155944.GC9715@codesourcery.com> References: <1240364008-7065-1-git-send-email-froydnj@codesourcery.com> <5b31733c0908011342q12cd08acwe0fe966a935dfc63@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <5b31733c0908011342q12cd08acwe0fe966a935dfc63@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Filip Navara Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 10:42:09PM +0200, Filip Navara wrote: > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 3:33 AM, Nathan Froyd wrote: > > handle_cpu_signal is very nearly copy-paste code for each target, with a > > few minor variations.  This patch sets up appropriate defaults for a > > generic handle_cpu_signal and provides overrides for particular targets > > that did things differently.  Fixing things like the persistent (XXX: > > use sigsetjmp) should now become somewhat easier. > > Any plans on reviving this patch? It's definitely a cleanup I am > interested in. I will try to get to posting a revised version incorporating Paul's comments in this next week. -Nathan