From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MY8PG-00087e-GK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 21:01:34 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MY8PB-0007uN-Mu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 21:01:33 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50295 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MY8PB-0007u3-H0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 21:01:29 -0400 Received: from speedy.comstyle.com ([206.51.28.2]:8443 helo=mail.comstyle.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MY8PA-0004Au-Il for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 21:01:28 -0400 Received: from [192.168.3.33] (toronto-hs-216-138-195-228.s-ip.magma.ca [216.138.195.228]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: brad) by mail.comstyle.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8836698461 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2009 21:01:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Brad Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 0.11.0-rc1 broken on OpenBSD. Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 21:01:14 -0400 References: <200908031229.13189.brad@comstyle.com> <200908031536.49307.brad@comstyle.com> <4A778585.1010505@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <4A778585.1010505@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200908032101.14836.brad@comstyle.com> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Monday 03 August 2009 20:49:09 Anthony Liguori wrote: > Brad wrote: > > On Monday 03 August 2009 15:24:09 Anthony Liguori wrote: > >> Brad wrote: > >>> Trying to compile QEMU 0.11.0-rc1 on OpenBSD/i386 it is broken at the > >>> moment.. > >>> > >>> gmake[1]: Entering directory > >>> `/stuff/ports/emulators/qemu.new/w-qemu-0.11.0-rc1/qemu-0.11.0-rc1/pc-b > >>>io s/optionrom' cc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Werror > >>> -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-builtin > >>> -I/stuff/ports/emulators/qemu.new/w-qemu-0.11.0-rc1/qemu-0.11.0-rc1 > >>> -fno-stack-protector -o > >> > >> Is cc not gcc? > > > > No. > > Too many negatives. Is cc gcc? If not, are you building QEMU with > whatever cc is or do we have an error in our Makefiles such that $(CC) > isn't getting propagated to the multiboot Makefile? Yes, it is. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.