From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MaWAf-0002rx-HC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:48:21 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MaWAa-0002pf-4G
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:48:20 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45045 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MaWAZ-0002pK-KP
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:48:15 -0400
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:56744)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <hch@lst.de>) id 1MaWAZ-0007RY-42
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:48:15 -0400
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:48:12 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 81/81] rename aio/CONFIG_AIO to
	posix_aio/CONFIG_POSIX_AIO
Message-ID: <20090810144811.GA16186@lst.de>
References: <cover.1249301360.git.quintela@redhat.com>
	<ac6a44593abcb2f4234f622b2d881bee858e10c3.1249301360.git.quintela@redhat.com>
	<4A8032CD.7030302@codemonkey.ws>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4A8032CD.7030302@codemonkey.ws>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>

On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:46:37AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Juan Quintela wrote:
> >Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
> >  
> 
> It's not actually posix-aio, but...
> 
> We should just get rid of CONFIG_AIO altogether.  We should always 
> enable it.

Yes.  I have a patch for it, but the second patch ontop that removes
the non-aio raw-posix code still has an issue.  I can send the CONFIG_AIO
removal patch alone in a few minutes if you care.