From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MaYoS-0001wH-Pl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:37:36 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MaYoO-0001nV-0Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:37:36 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46404 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MaYoN-0001n6-QK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:37:31 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:45664) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MaYoN-0005wC-AI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:37:31 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:37:29 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] SCO Unixware 2.1.x on qemu Message-ID: <20090810173729.GA26795@lst.de> References: <49303f60908081553u63e530e0i7132b689fd4647bf@mail.gmail.com> <176327.59355.qm@web30601.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <49303f60908091312t3a44f127ma206c89f4841287b@mail.gmail.com> <1E154A94-3602-4108-9E40-54E3A77A183B@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1E154A94-3602-4108-9E40-54E3A77A183B@web.de> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Andreas F?rber Cc: Diego Woitasen , QEMU Developers , Teemu N?tkinniemi On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 07:14:11PM +0200, Andreas F?rber wrote: > > Am 09.08.2009 um 22:12 schrieb Diego Woitasen: > > >The installation works with QEMU but it doesn't detect the CDROM. Is > >there something new in the virtual cdrom that makes Unixware fails on > >its detection? Is there something in the code that I could change? I > >trie'd my floppies and the CD on an old HP machine and works but the > >CDROM must have to be connected as primary slave. Using "-drive > >index=1...." doesn't work with QEMU. > > Justin Chevrier sent some patches for an SCO OpenServer guest, last > fall/winter. Part of it were some SCSI fixes iirc, so you could try > emulating a SCSI rather than IDE CD-ROM drive. > You might also want to check whether all the SCO-related patches > actually got committed. Patches for non-mainstream guests or hosts > tend to get less attention. Note that OpenServer is not related to Unixware 2.x at all. OpenServer was the last incarnation of the SVR3-based SCO Unix, while Unixware 2.x was the straight SVR4.2MP they acquired later. > > Regards, > Andreas > > ---end quoted text---