From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MdL3C-0003nw-0c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 05:32:18 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MdL36-0003mP-9S for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 05:32:16 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41266 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MdL35-0003mI-Uk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 05:32:11 -0400 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:58655 helo=mx1.suse.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MdL35-0003hR-HH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Aug 2009 05:32:11 -0400 From: Ulrich Hecht Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:32:06 +0200 References: <4A86D927.2090601@opensuse.org> <20090817183006.GA4433@kos.to> In-Reply-To: <20090817183006.GA4433@kos.to> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200908181132.06977.uli@suse.de> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/1] Corrected Version of uid16 fix for PowerPC List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Riku Voipio Cc: Martin Mohring , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Monday 17 August 2009, Riku Voipio wrote: > If the patch below supposed to supercede the s390x patch, shouldn't > this enable UID16 on s390x as well? I don't see how this patch relates to mine at all, really. Either way,=20 enabling UID16 on s390x would be incorrect. CU Uli --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG N=FCrnberg)