From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MgNsZ-0004Ch-2s
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:09:55 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MgNsU-00044f-1K
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:09:54 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47940 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MgNsT-00044I-Qb
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:09:49 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:32633)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gleb@redhat.com>) id 1MgNsS-0004nZ-LS
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:09:48 -0400
Received: from int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
	(int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.18])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7QJ9koJ012731
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:09:46 -0400
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:09:44 +0300
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] Route IOAPIC interrupts via ISA bus
Message-ID: <20090826190944.GD11762@redhat.com>
References: <1249836296-13288-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com>
	<1249836296-13288-3-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com>
	<4A955CB4.4080205@redhat.com> <4A955D6A.9060804@redhat.com>
	<4A95633E.7060703@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4A95633E.7060703@redhat.com>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 06:30:54PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On 08/26/09 18:06, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >On 08/26/2009 07:03 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >>Now we probably need some acpi magic to tell the guest OS that there
> >>are a few more IRQ lines?
> >
> >I wanted to route the PCI IRQs to those lines (and have eight links
> >instead of four).
> 
> Right now we have IRQs 5,10,11 for PCI.  Having one more IRQ (so we
> have one for each link) would be useful IMHO.  eight links + eight
> irqs would be even more useful.  What needs to be done for that?
> 
Current code uses piix3 irq router to route pci interrupts to pic _and_
ioapic and piix3 irq router supports only 16 interrupts.

--
			Gleb.