From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Mh0f5-0006Gq-DT
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 08:34:35 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Mh0f0-0006ES-9P
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 08:34:31 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40122 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mh0ez-0006DN-Lr
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 08:34:29 -0400
Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:50419)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <chris@arachsys.com>) id 1Mh0ey-0003cw-0O
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 08:34:28 -0400
Received: from alpha.arachsys.com ([91.203.57.7])
	by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <chris@arachsys.com>) id 1Mh0eu-0000LN-2P
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 08:34:24 -0400
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:34:17 +0100
From: Chris Webb <chris@arachsys.com>
Message-ID: <20090828123417.GA19448@arachsys.com>
References: <20090827085243.GA10938@arachsys.com>
	<5d6222a80908270455m1623c329jfd7bbe7dd08bebf9@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5d6222a80908270455m1623c329jfd7bbe7dd08bebf9@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [BACKPORT] vnc: rework VncState release workflow
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> writes:

> This code does not exist in my tree, so it can't possibly be removed.
> I assume that it is just safe to ignore it, though?

I think so, yes.

Best wishes,

Chris.