From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MiqcH-0007sW-K4
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 10:15:17 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MiqcD-0007p9-0o
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 10:15:17 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57561 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MiqcC-0007oy-NV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 10:15:12 -0400
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:51979)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <hch@lst.de>) id 1MiqcB-0007xN-UB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Sep 2009 10:15:12 -0400
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 16:15:06 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] block: use fdatasync instead of fsync
Message-ID: <20090902141506.GB18253@lst.de>
References: <20090831201627.GA4811@lst.de> <20090831201709.GB4874@lst.de>
	<f43fc5580909010859n138c4b06jfdd9a4a6277b7f92@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090901160409.GA22629@lst.de>
	<20090902003454.GE1321@shareable.org>
	<20090902003705.GA13309@lst.de>
	<f43fc5580909020702u508c4d1clc26f72c7030f1d63@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <f43fc5580909020702u508c4d1clc26f72c7030f1d63@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 05:02:32PM +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> > Now I'm pretty sure we'll find various fuckups where headers define
> > fdatasync but not _POSIX_SYNCHRONIZED_IO or vice versa, but I can
> > outsource adding workarounds for that to people with those broken
> > setups.
> 
> I'd use a real function, like qemu_fdatasync(). Especially if the
> Windows equivalent will be complex.

Ok.