From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Mjgsv-0006l7-SO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 18:03:57 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Mjgsr-0006kT-DQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 18:03:57 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55251 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mjgsr-0006kQ-AN
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 18:03:53 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52339)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <lcapitulino@redhat.com>) id 1Mjgsq-0000gB-Kj
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Sep 2009 18:03:52 -0400
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 19:03:41 -0300
From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH] qemu-kvm: fix segfault when running
	kvm without /dev/kvm, falling back to non-accelerated mode
Message-ID: <20090904190341.2c330060@doriath>
In-Reply-To: <20090904214623.GA10196@amt.cnet>
References: <d9c105ea0909031031g463aa731j846dd73d4c158ebc@mail.gmail.com>
	<1252008114.3084.136.camel@blaa>
	<d9c105ea0909031448v4d727c1cpaaa60d1e28820660@mail.gmail.com>
	<5d6222a80909031518h2bf804fbk1f7a52424d3e8649@mail.gmail.com>
	<1252048961.3144.8.camel@blaa> <1252080398.4625.47.camel@x200>
	<20090904163611.GC5132@amt.cnet>
	<d9c105ea0909041238j26d85cb1ndb7dc89315159e93@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090904183925.63b0b5f7@doriath> <20090904214623.GA10196@amt.cnet>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Dustin Kirkland <kirkland@canonical.com>, Costa <glommer@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Glauber@gnu.org

On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 18:46:23 -0300
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 06:39:25PM -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > > Sure, Marcelo.  It's attached.
> > > 
> > > I tested it, and it still does avoid the segfault.
> > > 
> > > Luiz, could you re-test this patch on your side too?
> > 
> >  I'm getting rejections, are you sure it's against upstream?
> 
> Its againts 0.11-stable branch. 

 duh. :)

 Works for me on 0.11-stable:

 Tested-by: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>