From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MlMhf-00052O-03 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:55:15 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MlMhX-000514-Ox for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:55:12 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38490 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MlMhW-00050q-PS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:55:07 -0400 Received: from os.inf.tu-dresden.de ([141.76.48.99]:56597) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MlMhV-0004Sk-Vw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 08:55:06 -0400 Received: from erwin.inf.tu-dresden.de ([141.76.48.80] helo=chrom.inf.tu-dresden.de) by os.inf.tu-dresden.de with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) id 1MlMhU-0001Hx-JB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:55:04 +0200 Received: from kauer by chrom.inf.tu-dresden.de with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MlMkU-0007rp-J5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:58:10 +0200 Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:58:10 +0200 From: Bernhard Kauer Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND2] Qemu unmaintained? Message-ID: <20090909125810.GB21997@chrom.inf.tu-dresden.de> References: <20090902074905.GB25711@chrom.inf.tu-dresden.de> <20090909121817.GA21997@chrom.inf.tu-dresden.de> <20090909122349.GA7873@amit-x200.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090909122349.GA7873@amit-x200.redhat.com> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 05:53:49PM +0530, Amit Shah wrote: > On (Wed) Sep 09 2009 [14:18:17], Bernhard Kauer wrote: > > Its wednesday again, time to resend a patch to the list. > > Until today the following happened in this endless story: > > > > 1. I wrote an RTC driver according to the manual which works on real hardware but not on Qemu. > > 2. I traced the bug back to the first public version of Bochs. Its seems to be also > > present in all derived version: Qemu, KVM, Xen, VBox... > > 3. I send a patch to the Qemu list at least 4 times. > > 4. I never got a single response to my patch. > > It's included in Anthony's staging tree: > > http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/aliguori-queue.git > > which means it can be flushed to the main git tree in the near future. Ah i missed this. > The current process of picking up patches is not verbose at all; > developers either have to wait till the patch magically appears in the > git tree or keep resending it. Yes, it would be nice to get a mail when somebody picked up the patch. Thanks, Bernhard