From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MlNCa-0001wp-Lo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:27:13 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MlNCT-0001sZ-QF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:27:10 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44507 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MlNCS-0001rr-Gk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:27:05 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52721) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MlNCR-0002tT-TE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:27:04 -0400 Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 16:26:57 +0300 From: Gleb Natapov Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND2] Qemu unmaintained? Message-ID: <20090909132657.GB22885@redhat.com> References: <20090902074905.GB25711@chrom.inf.tu-dresden.de> <20090909121817.GA21997@chrom.inf.tu-dresden.de> <4AA7A6EC.10907@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AA7A6EC.10907@codemonkey.ws> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Bernhard Kauer , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 08:00:28AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Bernhard Kauer wrote: > >Its wednesday again, time to resend a patch to the list. > >Until today the following happened in this endless story: > > Really, the whining just makes me want to drop your patch.. > > The first patch you sent didn't have [PATCH] in the subject. There > are hundreds of mails that are sent to the list every day. If you > don't mark a patch in a way that allows automatic filtering, it will > get dropped. > > When you resent, you did include [PATCH]. That patch made it into > my staging tree. See http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/aliguori-queue.git. > We had a holiday this past weekend so I'm a little slow in flushing > that queue to master. > It would be really nice to get mail that your patch was applied to staging. Casual contributor don't know that there is staging tree that should be checked or separate mailing list that he should subscribe too. -- Gleb.