From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MlNGq-0004ii-0E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:31:36 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MlNGl-0004gR-NW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:31:35 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59720 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MlNGl-0004gM-JD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:31:31 -0400 Received: from os.inf.tu-dresden.de ([141.76.48.99]:47863) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MlNGl-0003nv-26 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 09:31:31 -0400 Received: from erwin.inf.tu-dresden.de ([141.76.48.80] helo=chrom.inf.tu-dresden.de) by os.inf.tu-dresden.de with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) id 1MlNGj-0003Sz-NK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:31:29 +0200 Received: from kauer by chrom.inf.tu-dresden.de with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MlNJj-00080m-FL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:34:35 +0200 Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2009 15:34:35 +0200 From: Bernhard Kauer Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND2] Qemu unmaintained? Message-ID: <20090909133435.GC21997@chrom.inf.tu-dresden.de> References: <20090902074905.GB25711@chrom.inf.tu-dresden.de> <20090909121817.GA21997@chrom.inf.tu-dresden.de> <4AA7A6EC.10907@codemonkey.ws> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4AA7A6EC.10907@codemonkey.ws> List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 08:00:28AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote: > The first patch you sent didn't have [PATCH] in the subject. There > are hundreds of mails that are sent to the list every day. If you > don't mark a patch in a way that allows automatic filtering, it will > get dropped. That was at a time I thought: it cann't be true, that nobody noticed the bug that many years. Time proved otherwise... > When you resent, you did include [PATCH]. That patch made it into > my staging tree. See http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/aliguori-queue.git. > We had a holiday this past weekend so I'm a little slow in flushing > that queue to master. Your speed is not the problem. Getting a mail when you picked up the patch would have avoided my frustration. A mail to the mailinglist with all patches that made it in your tree could be also an option. Greetings, Bernhard Kauer