From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Mli7c-0002sz-RZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:47:28 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Mli7Y-0002ml-Uc
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:47:28 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52871 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Mli7Y-0002mh-JF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:47:24 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56874)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <lcapitulino@redhat.com>) id 1Mli7Y-00069o-3T
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:47:24 -0400
Received: from int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
	(int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8ABlM6q014168
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 07:47:23 -0400
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:47:13 -0300
From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND2] Qemu unmaintained?
Message-ID: <20090910084713.41dae0b4@doriath>
In-Reply-To: <20090910100804.GA7992@amit-x200.redhat.com>
References: <20090902074905.GB25711@chrom.inf.tu-dresden.de>
	<20090909121817.GA21997@chrom.inf.tu-dresden.de>
	<4AA7A6EC.10907@codemonkey.ws>
	<20090910070336.GD3351@amit-x200.redhat.com>
	<20090910075644.GA6769@1und1.de>
	<20090910100804.GA7992@amit-x200.redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:38:04 +0530
Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com> wrote:

> > - URL of staging tree
> 
> Might help; but various developers might have their own staging trees
> (as it now is). If things change in the future, this will have to be
> modified.

 I think he's talking about Anthony's staging, which is the most
important one for those submitting patches.

 I might be wrong about this but, the Linux kernel way of having
people maintaining subsystems didn't work out here yet.

 This discussion makes me think that the subject should be
'QEMU development process'.