From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MliLZ-0002Ui-C6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:01:53 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MliLU-0002Rk-NE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:01:52 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43379 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MliLU-0002RU-Gg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:01:48 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:32157) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MliLT-0000VV-Uz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:01:48 -0400 Received: from int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.18]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8AC1ke6005989 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:01:47 -0400 Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 17:31:21 +0530 From: Amit Shah Message-ID: <20090910120121.GB27014@amit-x200.redhat.com> References: <20090902074905.GB25711@chrom.inf.tu-dresden.de> <20090909121817.GA21997@chrom.inf.tu-dresden.de> <4AA7A6EC.10907@codemonkey.ws> <20090910070336.GD3351@amit-x200.redhat.com> <20090910075644.GA6769@1und1.de> <20090910100804.GA7992@amit-x200.redhat.com> <20090910084713.41dae0b4@doriath> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090910084713.41dae0b4@doriath> Subject: [Qemu-devel] QEMU patch management List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Luiz Capitulino Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On (Thu) Sep 10 2009 [08:47:13], Luiz Capitulino wrote: > On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:38:04 +0530 > Amit Shah wrote: > > > > - URL of staging tree > > > > Might help; but various developers might have their own staging trees > > (as it now is). If things change in the future, this will have to be > > modified. > > I think he's talking about Anthony's staging, which is the most > important one for those submitting patches. Right; and what I mean is like Anthony has his own queue, others might have theirs too. If something along the lines of what Avi suggested (having branches in the qemu repo for staging) gets implemented, this will have to be redone. > I might be wrong about this but, the Linux kernel way of having > people maintaining subsystems didn't work out here yet. It can easily be done. The process has to scale considering the number of submissions we're seeing. > This discussion makes me think that the subject should be > 'QEMU development process'. Amit