From: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Bernhard Kauer <kauer@os.inf.tu-dresden.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND2] Qemu unmaintained?
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 19:34:13 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090910140413.GA28534@amit-x200.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AA90592.7080100@codemonkey.ws>
On (Thu) Sep 10 2009 [08:56:34], Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>> If there'd be a daemon sending a mail saying the patch is in some
>> staging queue it'll reduce everyone's effort. Such extra mails
>> definitely aren't a problem. If it's later reverted because of any kind
>> of failure, again a polite mail wouldn't hurt.
>>
>
> The problem is patch volume. We often see hundreds of patches a day.
> If typing a mail for each patch takes 2 minutes, that's potentially
> hours spent just on sending these mails.
How about a bot that goes through your mailbox (or your git queue) and
sends the email? One reply-to-all email for each unique hash you have
against qemu-master?
> What I really need is some way to automatically generate these
> notifications. It's pretty easy to send a mail when a patch enters the
> queue but it's more difficult to send a mail when a patch is removed
> from the queue via a rebase. Often times, I remove patches from the
> queue simply because I'm not the right path for the patches to be
> committed from (like linux-user).
... and store the commit ids and subject in some file. When you rebase
and that particular commit-id + subject combination is not present, an
auto-email can be triggered
> Usually, if I remove a patch from the queue because something is wrong
> with it, I send out an email explaining what is wrong.
... but this is simpler and more efficient also because you can give the
reason along with the email rather than people mailing you later asking
why the patch was dropped.
Amit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-10 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-02 7:49 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND] RTC polling mode broken Bernhard Kauer
2009-09-09 12:18 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND2] Qemu unmaintained? Bernhard Kauer
2009-09-09 12:23 ` Amit Shah
2009-09-09 12:58 ` Bernhard Kauer
2009-09-09 12:25 ` Kevin Wolf
2009-09-09 13:00 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-09-09 13:26 ` Gleb Natapov
2009-09-09 13:45 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-09-09 14:31 ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-09 13:34 ` Bernhard Kauer
2009-09-10 7:03 ` Amit Shah
2009-09-10 7:56 ` Reimar Döffinger
2009-09-10 10:08 ` Amit Shah
2009-09-10 11:47 ` Luiz Capitulino
2009-09-10 12:01 ` [Qemu-devel] QEMU patch management Amit Shah
2009-09-10 12:29 ` [Qemu-devel] " Luiz Capitulino
2009-09-10 12:51 ` Reimar Döffinger
2009-09-10 13:11 ` Luiz Capitulino
2009-09-10 17:24 ` Reimar Döffinger
2009-09-10 13:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND2] Qemu unmaintained? Anthony Liguori
2009-09-10 13:56 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-09-10 14:04 ` Amit Shah [this message]
2009-09-10 14:12 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-09-10 15:15 ` Amit Shah
2009-09-10 14:38 ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-10 15:54 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-09-10 16:09 ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-10 16:22 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-09-10 16:35 ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-10 16:38 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-09-10 16:46 ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-10 17:19 ` Reimar Döffinger
2009-09-11 12:39 ` Amit Shah
2009-09-12 5:55 ` Blue Swirl
2009-09-13 15:44 ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-13 16:30 ` Blue Swirl
2009-09-11 7:06 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2009-09-10 18:29 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-09-10 18:40 ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-10 19:31 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-09-13 15:49 ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-10 20:36 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-09-13 16:19 ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-14 7:49 ` Mark McLoughlin
2009-09-14 7:59 ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-10 18:59 ` Reimar Döffinger
2009-09-10 16:05 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-09-10 16:14 ` Avi Kivity
2009-09-11 9:16 ` [Qemu-devel] commit e09a5267 (was: [PATCH] [RESEND2] Qemu unmaintained?) Jan Kiszka
2009-09-11 12:56 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: commit e09a5267 Anthony Liguori
2009-09-11 13:04 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090910140413.GA28534@amit-x200.redhat.com \
--to=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=kauer@os.inf.tu-dresden.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).