From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MmB3E-0003PI-VV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:40:52 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MmB3A-0003Mg-7D
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:40:52 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42624 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MmB3A-0003MS-01
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:40:48 -0400
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:41208)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps
	(TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA1:24) (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <hch@lst.de>) id 1MmB39-0000Dm-Ed
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2009 14:40:47 -0400
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:40:45 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] the qemu-iotests test suite is now available
Message-ID: <20090911184045.GD13621@lst.de>
References: <20090622210523.GA8024@lst.de> <4A409D65.3040104@redhat.com>
	<20090623143105.GA17748@lst.de> <4A40E86D.9060907@redhat.com>
	<20090623164130.GB27211@lst.de> <4A51DD6C.8030907@redhat.com>
	<20090706173606.GA2379@lst.de> <4AAA58E1.7040709@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4AAA58E1.7040709@redhat.com>
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 04:04:17PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Done.  Below is a version of my original patch with you l2 cluster size
> > changes incorporate.  The problem is that I really uses up tons of disk
> > space for the last test in io_test() for 64k clusters, in fact more than
> > I can make available on the laptop I'm travelling with currently..
> 
> What happened with this patch, Christoph? I just looked at the tests
> again and found that we're still aligning our test requests for 4k clusters.

I't been a while..  Wasn't this the one that took so long that it
didn't complete even in a few hours?