From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MmeIi-0004nA-If for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 21:54:48 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MmeIg-0004m1-GB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 21:54:47 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38285 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MmeIg-0004ly-Cd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 21:54:46 -0400 Received: from static-71-162-243-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([71.162.243.5]:43868 helo=grelber.thyrsus.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MmeIg-0001LT-0e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 21:54:46 -0400 Received: from landley.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grelber.thyrsus.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 373FE9F01C7 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2009 21:57:54 -0400 (EDT) From: Rob Landley Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 20:53:08 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200909122053.09374.rob@landley.net> Subject: [Qemu-devel] Closest system emulation to arm 920t? List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Is there a qemu-system-arm -cpu option that does something close to an arm 920t? I'm looking for something I can test an armv4t-eabi against. (You can't do an armv4l eabi without thumb, but if it does armv5 I haven't proved anything.) The only thing in the -cpu list that looks close is the ti925t, but the qemu version of the system image I have lying around that did boot on real 920t hardware (OABI, but still) won't boot on that. (I think the cache sizes in the kernel .config might be wrong? The kernel extracts and then I get nothing.) Any ideas? Thanks, Rob -- Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds